Proposal
Table of Contents
- The Rationale for and Aims of the Project
- Relationship to Research in the Area
- Current Status of the Proposed Project
- The Approach the Project Will Take
- The Anticipated Deliverables and Outcomes
- Conclusion
- Attachment 1 - Bibliography
- Attachment 3 - Time lines
- Attachment 4 - Project Team
- Attachment 5 - Screenshots of Prototype
- Attachment 6 - Proposed System Architecture
- Attachment 7 - Evaluation Plan
- Attachment 8 - Dissemination Plan
- Attachment 9 - Relationship to the project led by Dr Jo McKenzie (UTS)
Attachment 7 - Evaluation Plan
Evaluation Plan
| Timing | Factor to Evaluate | Questions to Address | Method(s) | Measure of Success |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July – September 2008 | The reviewees’ perspective/experience | In what way are you in control of the peer review process? In what way does the online peer review tool assist you in the re/development of your online learning and teaching course/component? Preconceptions |
‘Jottings’ questionnaire – users can take notes as they use the system. | Reliability. Ease of use. Support. Connection with ‘development, improvement and promotion. Connection with evaluation processes. Acknowledgment. |
| July – September 2008 | The reviewers’ perspective/experience (in each) partner institution | Good focus for peer review? Usefulness for making judgements. Value for time. |
Interview and questionnaire. Focus groups. |
Ease of use. Positive feedback from reviewees. |
| December 2008 | The wider view of how each institution may take forward the online peer review tool | Practicality. Collegiality |
Review and report from each partner. | Practical insight. |
| December 2008 through to July 2009 | The online peer review tool for online learning and teaching project itself | Is there value in having close (sub-regional) links on the issues surrounding the peer review of online learning and teaching? | Review by project steering committee and reference group. External review by independent evaluator. |
Commitment to maintain partnership in some form. |
Quality Assurance Plan
| Completed design | Compliance with | QA method | Evidence of compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final online learning and teaching review criteria | Fitness for purpose of evaluation and promotion | Internal review | Rated satisfactorily by academic teaching staff |
| Completed open source peer review tool | Fitness for purpose: peer review | Internal review | Rated satisfactorily by reviewers and reviewees |
| Completed open source peer review tool | Adherence to Satisfactory specifications and standards | Technical requirements | Satisfaction by online technology staff |